Quadro K2200 vs Radeon Pro 560X

CPU

GPU

Quadro K2200

2014Core: 1046 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz

Buy on Amazon

Radeon Pro 560X

2018Core: 1004 MHz

Buy on Amazon

Quadro K2200 vs Radeon Pro 560X Performance Spectrum

Quadro K2200

4 GB 68

3,580

0.0%

GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)

GeForce RTX 3060 12GB

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Radeon Pro 560X

2 GB 75

3,678

+2.7%

Radeon RX 580 (móvel)

Radeon RX 5600 OEM

Radeon RX 6650M XT

Radeon RX 6800

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K2200 vs Radeon Pro 560X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K2200 vs Radeon Pro 560X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K2200

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 560X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon Pro 560X

2018

Why buy it

✅22.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Quadro K2200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro 560X is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro 560X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 22.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (3,678 vs 3,580), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro 560X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K2200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K2200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 560X has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K2200 vs Radeon Pro 560X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K2200

The Quadro K2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,580 points. Launch price was $395.75.

Radeon Pro 560X

The Radeon Pro 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1004 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K2200 scores 3,580 and the Radeon Pro 560X reaches 3,678 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2200 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon Pro 560X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro K2200) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560X). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (Quadro K2200) vs 2.056 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560X).

Feature	Quadro K2200	Radeon Pro 560X
G3D Mark Score	3,580	3,678+3%
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	640	1024+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.439 TFLOPS	2.056 TFLOPS+43%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40	64+60%
L1 Cache	320 KB+25%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K2200	Radeon Pro 560X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K2200 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 560X carries 2 GB. Quadro K2200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K2200 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 560X. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro K2200) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 560X) — the Quadro K2200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K2200	Radeon Pro 560X
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2200) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro 560X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro K2200	Radeon Pro 560X
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th Gen (Quadro K2200) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon Pro 560X). Decoder: NVDEC 1 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2200) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 560X).

Feature	Quadro K2200	Radeon Pro 560X
Encoder	NVENC 4th Gen	VCE 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC 1	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K2200 draws 68W versus the Radeon Pro 560X's 75W — a 9.8% difference. The Quadro K2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2200) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 560X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 203mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.

Feature	Quadro K2200	Radeon Pro 560X
TDP	68W-9%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	203mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C	75
Perf/Watt	52.6+7%	49.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K2200 came in at $500, while the Radeon Pro 560X launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 560X was 100+% cheaper ($500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (Quadro K2200) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 560X) — the Radeon Pro 560X offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 560X (2018 vs 2014).

Feature	Quadro K2200	Radeon Pro 560X
MSRP	$500	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	7.2	Infinity
Codename	GM107	Polaris 21
Release	July 22 2014	July 16 2018
Ranking	#534	#528

Search Quadro K2200 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 560X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.