Quadro K2200
Radeon RX 560
Quadro K2200 vs Radeon RX 560 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro K2200 vs Radeon RX 560 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro K2200 vs Radeon RX 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro K2200
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 560 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌405.1% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 37.2 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Radeon RX 560
2017Why buy it
- ✅26.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $401 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 419.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.2 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Quadro K2200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 560 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K2200 vs Radeon RX 560 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro K2200
The Quadro K2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,580 points. Launch price was $395.75.
Radeon RX 560
The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K2200 scores 3,580 and the Radeon RX 560 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2200 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon RX 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro K2200) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (Quadro K2200) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1275 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro K2200 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,580 | 3,682+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1024+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.439 TFLOPS | 2.611 TFLOPS+81% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1275 MHz+13% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 64+60% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+25% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 560 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro K2200 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Quadro K2200 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K2200 and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 560. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro K2200) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560) — the Quadro K2200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K2200 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2200) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 560). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro K2200 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th Gen (Quadro K2200) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 560). Decoder: NVDEC 1 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2200) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 (Radeon RX 560).
| Feature | Quadro K2200 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4th Gen | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K2200 draws 68W versus the Radeon RX 560's 75W — a 9.8% difference. The Quadro K2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2200) vs 450W (Radeon RX 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 203mm vs 170mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70 C.
| Feature | Quadro K2200 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 68W-9% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 203mm | 170mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70 C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 52.6+7% | 49.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro K2200 came in at $500, while the Radeon RX 560 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon RX 560 was 80.2% cheaper ($401 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (Quadro K2200) vs 37.2 (Radeon RX 560) — the Radeon RX 560 offers 416.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 560 (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro K2200 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $99-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.2 | 37.2+417% |
| Codename | GM107 | Polaris 21 |
| Release | July 22 2014 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #534 | #527 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K2200 and Radeon RX 560
