Quadro K2200 vs Quadro K2200M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K2200 vs Quadro K2200M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K2200 vs Quadro K2200M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K2200

2014

Why buy it

✅5.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro K2200M

2014

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K2200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K2200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (3,580 vs 3,535), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K2200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K2200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro K2200 vs Quadro K2200M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K2200

The Quadro K2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,580 points. Launch price was $395.75.

Quadro K2200M

The Quadro K2200M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 19 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,535 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K2200 scores 3,580 and the Quadro K2200M reaches 3,535 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2200 is built on Maxwell while the Quadro K2200M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Quadro K2200) vs 640 (Quadro K2200M). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (Quadro K2200) vs 0.8538 TFLOPS (Quadro K2200M).

Feature	Quadro K2200	Quadro K2200M
G3D Mark Score	3,580+1%	3,535
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.439 TFLOPS+69%	0.8538 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40	40
L1 Cache	320 KB	320 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K2200	Quadro K2200M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K2200 and 64-bit on the Quadro K2200M.

Feature	Quadro K2200	Quadro K2200M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K2200 draws 68W versus the Quadro K2200M's 65W — a 4.5% difference. The Quadro K2200M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2200) vs 350W (Quadro K2200M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro K2200	Quadro K2200M
TDP	68W	65W-4%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	203mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	52.6	54.4+3%