P104-100 vs Quadro K2200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

P104-100 vs Quadro K2200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

P104-100 vs Quadro K2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

P104-100

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 68W, a 38W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Quadro K2200

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌126.7% higher power demand at 68W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

P104-100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (3,678 vs 3,580), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

P104-100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K2200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K2200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, P104-100 has the stronger long-term case.

P104-100 vs Quadro K2200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

P104-100

The P104-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.

Quadro K2200

The Quadro K2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,580 points. Launch price was $395.75.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The P104-100 scores 3,678 and the Quadro K2200 reaches 3,580 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P104-100 is built on Pascal while the Quadro K2200 uses Maxwell, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (P104-100) vs 640 (Quadro K2200). Raw compute: 6.655 TFLOPS (P104-100) vs 1.439 TFLOPS (Quadro K2200). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

Feature	P104-100	Quadro K2200
G3D Mark Score	3,678+3%	3,580
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell
Process Node	16 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1920+200%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.655 TFLOPS+362%	1.439 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1733 MHz+54%	1124 MHz
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	120+200%	40
L1 Cache	720 KB+125%	320 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	P104-100	Quadro K2200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The P104-100 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2200 carries 4 GB. Quadro K2200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the P104-100 and 64-bit on the Quadro K2200.

Feature	P104-100	Quadro K2200
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The P104-100 draws 30W versus the Quadro K2200's 68W — a 77.6% difference. The P104-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P104-100) vs 350W (Quadro K2200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	P104-100	Quadro K2200
TDP	30W-56%	68W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	203mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	122.6+133%	52.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the P104-100 came in at $0, while the Quadro K2200 launched at $500. On MSRP, P104-100 was 100+% cheaper ($500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (P104-100) vs 7.2 (Quadro K2200) — the P104-100 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is P104-100 (2017 vs 2014).

Feature	P104-100	Quadro K2200
MSRP	$0-100%	$500
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	7.2
Codename	GP104	GM107
Release	December 12 2017	July 22 2014
Ranking	#529	#534

Search P104-100 on Amazon

Search Quadro K2200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.