P104-100 vs Radeon R9 M485X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

P104-100 vs Radeon R9 M485X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

P104-100 vs Radeon R9 M485X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

P104-100

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 250W, a 220W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $450 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M485X

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌733.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 M485X is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.3% in PassMark G3D (3,801 vs 3,678), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

P104-100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M485X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M485X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, P104-100 has the stronger long-term case.

P104-100 vs Radeon R9 M485X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

P104-100

The P104-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.

Radeon R9 M485X

The Radeon R9 M485X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,801 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The P104-100 scores 3,678 and the Radeon R9 M485X reaches 3,801 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P104-100 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 M485X uses GCN 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (P104-100) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M485X). Raw compute: 6.655 TFLOPS (P104-100) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M485X).

Feature	P104-100	Radeon R9 M485X
G3D Mark Score	3,678	3,801+3%
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 3.0
Process Node	16 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1920	2048+7%
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.655 TFLOPS+125%	2.961 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	120	128+7%
L1 Cache	720 KB+41%	512 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	P104-100	Radeon R9 M485X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the P104-100 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M485X. L2 Cache: 2 MB (P104-100) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M485X) — the P104-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	P104-100	Radeon R9 M485X
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The P104-100 draws 30W versus the Radeon R9 M485X's 250W — a 157.1% difference. The P104-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P104-100) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M485X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	P104-100	Radeon R9 M485X
TDP	30W-88%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	122.6+707%	15.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the P104-100 came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 M485X launched at $450. On MSRP, P104-100 was 100+% cheaper ($450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (P104-100) vs 8.4 (Radeon R9 M485X) — the P104-100 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is P104-100 (2017 vs 2016).

Feature	P104-100	Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP	$0-100%	$450
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	8.4
Codename	GP104	Amethyst
Release	December 12 2017	May 15 2016
Ranking	#529	#519

Search P104-100 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M485X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.