P104-100 vs T400

P104-100

2017Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
VS

T400

2021Core: 420 MHzBoost: 1425 MHz

P104-100 vs T400 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

P104-100 vs T400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

P104-100

2017

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $180 MSRP).

T400

2021

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • P104-100 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so T400 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
P104-100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (3,678 vs 3,609), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
T400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 16nm, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2017. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
T400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. P104-100 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

P104-100 vs T400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

P104-100

The P104-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.

T400

The T400 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,609 points.

Graphics Performance

The P104-100 scores 3,678 and the T400 reaches 3,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P104-100 is built on Pascal while the T400 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (P104-100) vs 384 (T400). Raw compute: 6.655 TFLOPS (P104-100) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1425 MHz.

FeatureP104-100T400
G3D Mark Score
3,678+2%
3,609
Architecture
Pascal
Turing
Process Node
16 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1920+400%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.655 TFLOPS+508%
1.094 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1733 MHz+22%
1425 MHz
ROPs
64+300%
16
TMUs
120+400%
24
L1 Cache
720 KB+88%
384 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureP104-100T400
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The P104-100 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the T400 carries 4 GB. T400 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the P104-100 and 64-bit on the T400. L2 Cache: 2 MB (P104-100) vs 1 MB (T400) — the P104-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureP104-100T400
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The P104-100 draws 30W versus the T400's 30W — a 0% difference. The T400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P104-100) vs 350W (T400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureP104-100T400
TDP
30W
30W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
122.6+2%
120.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the P104-100 came in at $0, while the T400 launched at $180. On MSRP, P104-100 was 100+% cheaper ($180 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (P104-100) vs 20.1 (T400) — the P104-100 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is T400 (2021 vs 2017).

FeatureP104-100T400
MSRP
$0-100%
$180
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
20.1
Codename
GP104
TU117
Release
December 12 2017
May 6 2021
Ranking
#529
#532

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.