FirePro S7150 vs P104-100

FirePro S7150

2016Core: 920 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

P104-100

2017Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
Similar parts
··

FirePro S7150 vs P104-100 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro S7150 vs P104-100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro S7150

2016

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.

P104-100

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro S7150 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (3,770 vs 3,678), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro S7150 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro S7150 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro S7150 vs P104-100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro S7150

The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.

NVIDIA

P104-100

The P104-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S7150 scores 3,770 and the P104-100 reaches 3,678 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7150 is built on GCN 3.0 while the P104-100 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro S7150) vs 1,920 (P104-100). Raw compute: 3.768 TFLOPS (FirePro S7150) vs 6.655 TFLOPS (P104-100).

FeatureFirePro S7150P104-100
G3D Mark Score
3,770+3%
3,678
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
2048+7%
1920
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.768 TFLOPS
6.655 TFLOPS+77%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
128+7%
120
L1 Cache
512 KB
720 KB+41%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro S7150P104-100
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S7150 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the P104-100 carries 2 GB. FirePro S7150 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S7150 and 64-bit on the P104-100. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro S7150) vs 2 MB (P104-100) — the P104-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro S7150P104-100
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S7150 draws 150W versus the P104-100's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The P104-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7150) vs 350W (P104-100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFirePro S7150P104-100
TDP
150W
30W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
25.1
122.6+388%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro S7150 came in at $2399, while the P104-100 launched at $0. On MSRP, P104-100 was 100+% cheaper ($2399 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (FirePro S7150) vs Infinity (P104-100) — the P104-100 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is P104-100 (2017 vs 2016).

FeatureFirePro S7150P104-100
MSRP
$2399
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
1.6
Infinity
Codename
Tonga
GP104
Release
February 1 2016
December 12 2017
Ranking
#521
#529

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.