P104-100 vs Quadro P620

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

P104-100 vs Quadro P620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

P104-100 vs Quadro P620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

P104-100

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 40W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $170 MSRP).

Quadro P620

2018

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅P104-100 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro P620 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌33.3% higher power demand at 40W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro P620 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (3,698 vs 3,678), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P620 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 16nm and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro P620 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

P104-100 vs Quadro P620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

P104-100

The P104-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.

Quadro P620

The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The P104-100 scores 3,678 and the Quadro P620 reaches 3,698 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P104-100 is built on Pascal while the Quadro P620 uses Pascal, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (P104-100) vs 512 (Quadro P620). Raw compute: 6.655 TFLOPS (P104-100) vs 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1443 MHz.

Feature	P104-100	Quadro P620
G3D Mark Score	3,678	3,698
Architecture	Pascal	Pascal
Process Node	16 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1920+275%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.655 TFLOPS+350%	1.478 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1733 MHz+20%	1443 MHz
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	120+275%	32
L1 Cache	720 KB+275%	192 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	P104-100	Quadro P620
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the P104-100 and 64-bit on the Quadro P620. L2 Cache: 2 MB (P104-100) vs 1 MB (Quadro P620) — the P104-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	P104-100	Quadro P620
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The P104-100 draws 30W versus the Quadro P620's 40W — a 28.6% difference. The P104-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P104-100) vs 350W (Quadro P620). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	P104-100	Quadro P620
TDP	30W-25%	40W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	145mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	122.6+33%	92.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the P104-100 came in at $0, while the Quadro P620 launched at $170. On MSRP, P104-100 was 100+% cheaper ($170 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (P104-100) vs 21.8 (Quadro P620) — the P104-100 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P620 (2018 vs 2017).

Feature	P104-100	Quadro P620
MSRP	$0-100%	$170
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	21.8
Codename	GP104	GP107
Release	December 12 2017	February 1 2018
Ranking	#529	#524

Search P104-100 on Amazon

Search Quadro P620 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.