P104-100 vs Radeon RX 560

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

P104-100 vs Radeon RX 560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

P104-100 vs Radeon RX 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

P104-100

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 37.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Radeon RX 560

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅P104-100 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 560 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX 560 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (3,682 vs 3,678), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 560 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) and FSR Frame Generation (2023), while P104-100 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, and a 14nm process instead of 16nm. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 560 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

P104-100 vs Radeon RX 560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

P104-100

The P104-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.

Radeon RX 560

The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The P104-100 scores 3,678 and the Radeon RX 560 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P104-100 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (P104-100) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560). Raw compute: 6.655 TFLOPS (P104-100) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1275 MHz.

Feature	P104-100	Radeon RX 560
G3D Mark Score	3,678	3,682
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 4.0
Process Node	16 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1920+88%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.655 TFLOPS+155%	2.611 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1733 MHz+36%	1275 MHz
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	120+88%	64
L1 Cache	720 KB+181%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 560 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The P104-100 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	P104-100	Radeon RX 560
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The P104-100 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560 carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 560 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the P104-100 and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 560. L2 Cache: 2 MB (P104-100) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560) — the P104-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	P104-100	Radeon RX 560
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The P104-100 draws 30W versus the Radeon RX 560's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The P104-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P104-100) vs 450W (Radeon RX 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	P104-100	Radeon RX 560
TDP	30W-60%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	170mm
Height	—	112mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	70 C
Perf/Watt	122.6+150%	49.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the P104-100 came in at $0, while the Radeon RX 560 launched at $99. On MSRP, P104-100 was 100+% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (P104-100) vs 37.2 (Radeon RX 560) — the P104-100 offers Infinity% better value.

Feature	P104-100	Radeon RX 560
MSRP	$0-100%	$99
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	37.2
Codename	GP104	Polaris 21
Release	December 12 2017	April 18 2017
Ranking	#529	#527

Search P104-100 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 560 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.