Quadro K2200 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K2200 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K2200 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K2200

2014

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 4100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
25.3% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌36% higher power demand at 68W vs 50W.

Radeon Pro WX 4100

2016

Why buy it

✅24.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 28.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 68W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 24.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (3,682 vs 3,580), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K2200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro WX 4100 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $101 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 28.9% (9.2 vs 7.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K2200 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K2200 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K2200

The Quadro K2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,580 points. Launch price was $395.75.

Radeon Pro WX 4100

The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K2200 scores 3,580 and the Radeon Pro WX 4100 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2200 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro K2200) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (Quadro K2200) vs 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1201 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K2200	Radeon Pro WX 4100
G3D Mark Score	3,580	3,682+3%
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	640	1024+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.439 TFLOPS	2.46 TFLOPS+71%
Boost Clock	1124 MHz	1201 MHz+7%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40	64+60%
L1 Cache	320 KB+25%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K2200	Radeon Pro WX 4100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K2200 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4100. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro K2200) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4100) — the Quadro K2200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K2200	Radeon Pro WX 4100
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K2200 draws 68W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4100's 50W — a 30.5% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2200) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro K2200	Radeon Pro WX 4100
TDP	68W	50W-26%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	203mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	52.6	73.6+40%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K2200 came in at $500, while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 launched at $399. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX 4100 was 20.2% cheaper ($101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (Quadro K2200) vs 9.2 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) — the Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers 27.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 4100 (2016 vs 2014).

Feature	Quadro K2200	Radeon Pro WX 4100
MSRP	$500	$399-20%
Performance per Dollar	7.2	9.2+28%
Codename	GM107	Baffin
Release	July 22 2014	November 10 2016
Ranking	#534	#526

Search Quadro K2200 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro WX 4100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.