Quadro K2200 vs T400

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro K2200

68

3,580

0.0%

GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3060 12GB

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

T400

30

3,609

+0.8%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K2200 is positioned at rank 169 and the T400 is on rank 80, so the T400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2200

#75

Radeon Pro Vega II

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800

99%

#76

Radeon PRO W7900

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500

98%

#77

Radeon Pro VII

MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400

97%

#78

Quadro RTX 5000

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

94%

#79

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

93%

#80

Radeon Pro W6800X

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

90%

#154

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2063%

#169

Quadro K2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $40

100%

#173

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

MSRP: $119|Avg: $86

98%

#175

Radeon Pro 560

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

97%

#176

Radeon Pro 460

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

97%

#180

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

MSRP: $139|Avg: $85

93%

#181

FirePro M5950

MSRP: $200|Avg: $200

92%

#183

Radeon Pro WX 7130

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $200

90%

#184

FirePro W7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $114

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar T400

#38

Radeon PRO W6600X

MSRP: $699|Avg: $699

94%

#41

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

90%

#42

Radeon Pro W5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $300

90%

#43

Radeon Pro W5700X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

88%

#44

RTX A4000

MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111

87%

#45

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

MSRP: $849|Avg: $748

84%

#46

Quadro RTX 4000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $220

83%

#65

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

737%

#80

T400

MSRP: $180|Avg: $179

100%

#86

Quadro P3200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $63

86%

#89

Quadro P2000

MSRP: $425|Avg: $190

82%

#90

Quadro T1000

MSRP: $400|Avg: $425

81%

#93

Radeon Pro 580

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

77%

#94

T1000 8GB

MSRP: $500|Avg: $380

77%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The T400 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2014). The T400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K2200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The T400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K2200.

Insight	Quadro K2200	T400
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro K2200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $179 for the T400, it costs 78% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 343.9% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro K2200	T400
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+343.9%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($40)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($179)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro K2200 Benchmark Check

T400 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K2200 and T400

Quadro K2200

The Quadro K2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,580 points. Launch price was $395.75.

T400

The T400 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,609 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K2200 scores 3,580 and the T400 reaches 3,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2200 is built on Maxwell while the T400 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro K2200) vs 384 (T400). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (Quadro K2200) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1425 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K2200	T400
G3D Mark Score	3,580	3,609
Architecture	Maxwell	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	640+67%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.439 TFLOPS+32%	1.094 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1124 MHz	1425 MHz+27%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40+67%	24
L1 Cache	320 KB	384 KB+20%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K2200	T400
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro K2200) vs 1 MB (T400) — the Quadro K2200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K2200	T400
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K2200 draws 68W versus the T400's 30W — a 77.6% difference. The T400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2200) vs 350W (T400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro K2200	T400
TDP	68W	30W-56%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	203mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	52.6	120.3+129%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro K2200 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the T400 launched at $180 and now averages $179. The Quadro K2200 costs 77.7% less ($139 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 89.5 (Quadro K2200) vs 20.2 (T400) — the Quadro K2200 offers 343.1% better value. The T400 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2014).