Quadro K2200
T400
Quadro K2200 vs T400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro K2200 vs T400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Quadro K2200 vs T400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro K2200
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌177.8% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$180 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 20.1 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
- ❌126.7% higher power demand at 68W vs 30W.
T400
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $320 less on MSRP ($180 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 180% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.1 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Quadro K2200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so T400 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 68W, a 38W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K2200 vs T400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro K2200
The Quadro K2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,580 points. Launch price was $395.75.
T400
The T400 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,609 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K2200 scores 3,580 and the T400 reaches 3,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2200 is built on Maxwell while the T400 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro K2200) vs 384 (T400). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (Quadro K2200) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro K2200 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,580 | 3,609 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.439 TFLOPS+32% | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1425 MHz+27% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 384 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K2200 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K2200 and 64-bit on the T400. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro K2200) vs 1 MB (T400) — the Quadro K2200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K2200 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K2200 draws 68W versus the T400's 30W — a 77.6% difference. The T400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2200) vs 350W (T400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro K2200 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 68W | 30W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 203mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 52.6 | 120.3+129% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro K2200 came in at $500, while the T400 launched at $180. On MSRP, T400 was 64% cheaper ($320 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (Quadro K2200) vs 20.1 (T400) — the T400 offers 179.2% better value. The newer card here is T400 (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro K2200 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $180-64% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.2 | 20.1+179% |
| Codename | GM107 | TU117 |
| Release | July 22 2014 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #534 | #532 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K2200 and T400
