Radeon Pro 560 vs Radeon Pro W5500M

AMD

Radeon Pro 560

2017Core: 907 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro W5500M

2020Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon Pro 560 vs Radeon Pro W5500M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro 560 vs Radeon Pro W5500M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro 560 vs Radeon Pro W5500M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro 560

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W5500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon Pro W5500M

2020

Why buy it

  • 14.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Radeon Pro 560 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro W5500M is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro W5500M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 14.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro 560 instead at 3,475 vs 3,470, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro W5500M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 7nm process instead of 14nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2017. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro 560 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro 560 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro W5500M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro 560 vs Radeon Pro W5500M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro 560

The Radeon Pro 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,475 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro W5500M

The Radeon Pro W5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,470 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 560 scores 3,475 and the Radeon Pro W5500M reaches 3,470 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 560 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Pro W5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560) vs 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500M). Raw compute: 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560) vs 4.083 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500M).

FeatureRadeon Pro 560Radeon Pro W5500M
G3D Mark Score
3,475
3,470
Architecture
GCN 4.0
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
14 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
1024
1408+38%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.858 TFLOPS
4.083 TFLOPS+120%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
64
88+38%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling + RSR

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro 560Radeon Pro W5500M
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro 560 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5500M carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro W5500M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 560 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro W5500M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 560) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro W5500M) — the Radeon Pro W5500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro 560Radeon Pro W5500M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 560 draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro W5500M's 85W — a 12.5% difference. The Radeon Pro 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 560) vs 350W (Radeon Pro W5500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon Pro 560Radeon Pro W5500M
TDP
75W-12%
85W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
46.3+13%
40.8
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro W5500M (2020 vs 2017).

FeatureRadeon Pro 560Radeon Pro W5500M
MSRP
$500
Codename
Polaris 21
Navi 14
Release
April 18 2017
February 10 2020
Ranking
#543
#544

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.