
Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX TITAN X

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX TITAN X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX TITAN X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $280 for the Radeon Pro 5700 XT, it costs 57% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 136.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+136.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5700 XT and GeForce GTX TITAN X

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.

GeForce GTX TITAN X
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT scores 12,442 and the GeForce GTX TITAN X reaches 12,621 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce GTX TITAN X uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Raw compute: 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Boost clocks: 1499 MHz vs 1075 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,442 | 12,621+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3072+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.675 TFLOPS+15% | 6.691 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1499 MHz+39% | 1075 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 192+20% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX TITAN X has 12 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) — the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (FL 12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Decoder: Unified Video Decoder 7.0 vs NVDEC 2nd gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | RDNA 1.0 | NVENC 2nd gen |
| Decoder | Unified Video Decoder 7.0 | NVDEC 2nd gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT draws 130W versus the GeForce GTX TITAN X's 250W — a 63.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 83°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-48% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-10% | 83°C |
| Perf/Watt | 95.7+90% | 50.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $280, while the GeForce GTX TITAN X launched at $999 and now averages $120. The GeForce GTX TITAN X costs 57.1% less ($160 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 44.4 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 105.2 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) — the GeForce GTX TITAN X offers 136.9% better value. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-50% | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $280 | $120-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4 | 105.2+137% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | GM200 |
| Release | August 4 2020 | March 17 2015 |
| Ranking | #215 | #209 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















