CPU
GPU
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Popular choices:
Arc A750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Performance Per Dollar Arc A750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (268mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc A750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $229 versus $280 for the Radeon Pro 5700 XT, it costs 18% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 23.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+23.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280) | ✅More affordable ($229) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5700 XT and Arc A750
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT scores 12,442 and the Arc A750 reaches 12,600 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Arc A750 uses Generation 12.7, both on 7 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 3,584 (Arc A750). Raw compute: 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750). Boost clocks: 1499 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,442 | 12,600+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3584+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.675 TFLOPS | 17.2 TFLOPS+124% |
| Boost Clock | 1499 MHz | 2400 MHz+60% |
| ROPs | 64 | 112+75% |
| TMUs | 160 | 224+40% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 16 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A750 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 16 MB (Arc A750) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 16 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A750). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750). Decoder: Unified Video Decoder 7.0 vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | RDNA 1.0 | Dual Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | Unified Video Decoder 7.0 | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT draws 130W versus the Arc A750's 225W — a 53.5% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 650W (Arc A750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin + 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 78°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-42% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin + 6-pin |
| Length | — | 268mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-4% | 78°C |
| Perf/Watt | 95.7+71% | 56.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $280, while the Arc A750 launched at $289 and now averages $229. The Arc A750 costs 18.2% less ($51 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 44.4 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 55.0 (Arc A750) — the Arc A750 offers 23.9% better value. The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $289-42% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $280 | $229-18% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4 | 55.0+24% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | DG2-512 |
| Release | August 4 2020 | October 12 2022 |
| Ranking | #215 | #212 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro 5700 XT and Arc A750
