Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs GRID RTX6000-1Q
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Popular choices:
GRID RTX6000-1Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Performance Per Dollar GRID RTX6000-1Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID RTX6000-1Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID RTX6000-1Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $280 versus $1,500 for the GRID RTX6000-1Q, it costs 81% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 428.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+428.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($280) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5700 XT and GRID RTX6000-1Q
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.
GRID RTX6000-1Q
The GRID RTX6000-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,617 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT scores 12,442 and the GRID RTX6000-1Q reaches 12,617 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GRID RTX6000-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Raw compute: 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Boost clocks: 1499 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,442 | 12,617+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.675 TFLOPS+59% | 4.825 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1499 MHz+27% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+25% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GRID RTX6000-1Q has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-1Q) — the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 12.2 (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Decoder: Unified Video Decoder 7.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID RTX6000-1Q).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | RDNA 1.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Unified Video Decoder 7.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT draws 130W versus the GRID RTX6000-1Q's 225W — a 53.5% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 500W (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-42% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 95.7+71% | 56.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $280, while the GRID RTX6000-1Q launched at $6299 and now averages $1500. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT costs 81.3% less ($1220 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 44.4 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 8.4 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) — the Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 428.6% better value. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-92% | $6299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $280-81% | $1500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+429% | 8.4 |
| Codename | Navi 10 | GM204 |
| Release | August 4 2020 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #215 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro 5700 XT and GRID RTX6000-1Q
