
Radeon Pro 580
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 580 2048SP across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌118.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
Radeon RX 580 2048SP
2018Why buy it
- ✅20.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $271 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 115% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 15.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 16 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon Pro 580
2017Radeon RX 580 2048SP
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅20.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $271 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 115% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 15.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 580 2048SP across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌118.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 16 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 580 2048SP better than Radeon Pro 580?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 580 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 31 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 50 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 580 and Radeon RX 580 2048SP

Radeon Pro 580
Radeon Pro 580
The Radeon Pro 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,753 points.

Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Radeon RX 580 2048SP
The Radeon RX 580 2048SP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1168 MHz to 1284 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,633 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 580 scores 7,753 and the Radeon RX 580 2048SP reaches 7,633 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 580 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 580 2048SP uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 580 2048SP). Raw compute: 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580) vs 5.259 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 580 2048SP). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1284 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,753+2% | 7,633 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+13% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.53 TFLOPS+5% | 5.259 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1284 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+13% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+13% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 580 2048SP is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 580 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 580 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 580 2048SP has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 580 2048SP offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 16 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580) vs 12 (Radeon RX 580 2048SP). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 580 2048SP). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 580 2048SP).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 580 draws 150W versus the Radeon RX 580 2048SP's 150W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 580 2048SP is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 580) vs 450W (Radeon RX 580 2048SP). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 51.7+2% | 50.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 580 launched at $500 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 580 2048SP launched at $229. The Radeon RX 580 2048SP costs 54.2% less ($271 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.5 (Radeon Pro 580) vs 33.3 (Radeon RX 580 2048SP) — the Radeon RX 580 2048SP offers 114.8% better value. The Radeon RX 580 2048SP is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $229-54% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.5 | 33.3+115% |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | June 5 2017 | October 15 2018 |
| Ranking | #327 | #334 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












