
GeForce GTX 780

Radeon Pro 580
GeForce GTX 780 vs Radeon Pro 580 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 780 vs Radeon Pro 580 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 780 vs Radeon Pro 580: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 780
2013Why buy it
- ✅10.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
Radeon Pro 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 780 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌0.2% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 780 vs Radeon Pro 580 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 780
The GeForce GTX 780 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,957 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon Pro 580
The Radeon Pro 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,753 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 scores 7,957 and the Radeon Pro 580 reaches 7,753 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 580 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,957+3% | 7,753 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS | 5.53 TFLOPS+33% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1200 MHz+33% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 192+33% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 576 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 780 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 580 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 780 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 580 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 780 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 780 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 580. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 580) — the Radeon Pro 580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 780) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro 580's 150W — a 50% difference. The Radeon Pro 580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 580). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 150W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 31.8 | 51.7+63% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 780 came in at $499, while the Radeon Pro 580 launched at $500. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 780 was 0.2% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.9 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 15.5 (Radeon Pro 580) — the GeForce GTX 780 offers 2.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 580 (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.9+3% | 15.5 |
| Codename | GK110 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | May 23 2013 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #320 | #327 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















