
Radeon Pro 580 vs T1000 8GB

Radeon Pro 580
Popular choices:

T1000 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 580 is positioned at rank 93 and the T1000 8GB is on rank 94, so the Radeon Pro 580 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 580
Performance Per Dollar T1000 8GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The T1000 8GB uses modern memory architecture. The T1000 8GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro 580 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 580 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the T1000 8GB.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 580 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 580 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $380 for the T1000 8GB, it costs 61% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 155.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 580 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+155.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 580 and T1000 8GB

Radeon Pro 580
The Radeon Pro 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,753 points.

T1000 8GB
The T1000 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,674 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 580 scores 7,753 and the T1000 8GB reaches 7,674 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 580 is built on GCN 4.0 while the T1000 8GB uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580) vs 896 (T1000 8GB). Raw compute: 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580) vs 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000 8GB). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1395 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,753+1% | 7,674 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+157% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.53 TFLOPS+121% | 2.5 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1395 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+157% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB | 896 KB+56% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 580) vs 1 MB (T1000 8GB) — the Radeon Pro 580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580) vs 12.1 (T1000 8GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580) vs NVENC 7.0 (T1000 8GB). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000 8GB).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 580 draws 150W versus the T1000 8GB's 50W — a 100% difference. The T1000 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 580) vs 350W (T1000 8GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 156mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 50W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 156mm |
| Height | 0mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 51.7 | 153.5+197% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 580 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the T1000 8GB launched at $500 and now averages $380. The Radeon Pro 580 costs 60.5% less ($230 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 51.7 (Radeon Pro 580) vs 20.2 (T1000 8GB) — the Radeon Pro 580 offers 155.9% better value. The T1000 8GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-61% | $380 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+156% | 20.2 |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | TU117 |
| Release | June 5 2017 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #327 | #332 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












