Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs Arc A370M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Arc A370M

#52

Radeon 8060S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

88%

#201

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

422%

#203

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

383%

#204

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

382%

#208

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

347%

#209

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

345%

#211

Arc A370M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#212

GeForce GTX 780M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

100%

#216

Radeon 8040S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

95%

#217

Radeon R7 +8G

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

95%

#221

Radeon HD 6550A

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

92%

#222

Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)

MSRP: $150|Avg: $75

91%

#224

GeForce GT 640M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Arc A370M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon Pro Vega 20	Arc A370M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020))	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro Vega 20 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro Vega 20 Benchmark Check

Arc A370M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 20 and Arc A370M

Radeon Pro Vega 20

The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1283 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,169 points.

Arc A370M

The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro Vega 20 scores 5,169 and the Arc A370M reaches 5,115 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Arc A370M uses Generation 12.7, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs 1,024 (Arc A370M). Raw compute: 3.284 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs 3.174 TFLOPS (Arc A370M). Boost clocks: 1283 MHz vs 1550 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 20	Arc A370M
G3D Mark Score	5,169+1%	5,115
Architecture	GCN 5.0	Generation 12.7
Process Node	14 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	1280+25%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.284 TFLOPS+3%	3.174 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1283 MHz	1550 MHz+21%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80+25%	64
L1 Cache	0.31 MB	1.5 MB+384%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 20	Arc A370M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	XeSS
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro Vega 20 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Arc A370M has 4 GB. The Arc A370M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs 4 MB (Arc A370M) — the Arc A370M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 20	Arc A370M
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A370M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 20	Arc A370M
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc A370M). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A370M).

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 20	Arc A370M
Encoder	VCE 4.0	Xe Media Engine
Decoder	UVD 7.0	Xe Media Engine
Codecs	H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro Vega 20 draws 100W versus the Arc A370M's 35W — a 96.3% difference. The Arc A370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs 350W (Arc A370M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 90.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 20	Arc A370M
TDP	100W	35W-65%
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	80-11%	90
Perf/Watt	51.7	146.1+183%