Radeon Pro Vega 20
VS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 20

2018Core: 815 MHzBoost: 1283 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

2018Core: 1152 MHzBoost: 1417 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

#6
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
123%
#8
111%
#9
111%
#13
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
101%
#14
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
100%
#15
100%
#18
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro Vega 20.

InsightRadeon Pro Vega 20GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%)
Leading raw performance (+2.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 20 and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 20

The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1283 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,169 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1152 MHz to 1417 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,310 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro Vega 20 scores 5,169 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design reaches 5,310 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is built on GCN 5.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design uses Pascal, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 3.284 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs 2.177 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1283 MHz vs 1417 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 20GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score
5,169
5,310+3%
Architecture
GCN 5.0
Pascal
Process Node
14 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1280+67%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.284 TFLOPS+51%
2.177 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1283 MHz
1417 MHz+10%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80+67%
48
L1 Cache
320 KB+11%
288 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 20GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro Vega 20 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 20GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 20GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design).

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 20GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Encoder
VCE 4.0
NVENC (6th Gen)
Decoder
UVD 7.0
NVDEC (3rd Gen)
Codecs
H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro Vega 20 draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 70°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 20GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
TDP
100W
75W-25%
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80
70°C-13%
Perf/Watt
51.7
70.8+37%