
Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

Radeon Pro Vega 20
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro Vega 20 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 20 and GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

Radeon Pro Vega 20
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1283 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,169 points.

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1392 MHz to 1518 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,116 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 scores 5,169 and the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB reaches 5,116 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is built on GCN 5.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB uses Pascal, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Raw compute: 3.284 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs 2.332 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Boost clocks: 1283 MHz vs 1518 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,169+1% | 5,116 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+67% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.284 TFLOPS+41% | 2.332 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1283 MHz | 1518 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 80+67% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+11% | 288 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) — the Radeon Pro Vega 20 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+33% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs NVDEC 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | NVDEC 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Power connectors: Integrated vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 65.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 75W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 300W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Length | 0mm | 145mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 65-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 51.7 | 68.2+32% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB launched at $129 and now averages $60. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 costs 100+% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs 85.3 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) — the Radeon Pro Vega 20 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $129 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 85.3 |
| Codename | Vega 12 | GP107 |
| Release | November 14 2018 | May 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #435 | #440 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















