
Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs GeForce GTX 980

Radeon Pro Vega 48
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 980
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega 48
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 980 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 980 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | Standard Buffer (0 MB) | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 980 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $450 for the Radeon Pro Vega 48, it costs 89% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 784.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+784.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($450) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 48 and GeForce GTX 980

Radeon Pro Vega 48
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,270 points.

GeForce GTX 980
The GeForce GTX 980 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1064 MHz to 1216 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,077 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 scores 11,270 and the GeForce GTX 980 reaches 11,077 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is built on GCN 5.0 while the GeForce GTX 980 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 2,048 (GeForce GTX 980). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 4.981 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980). Boost clocks: 1300 MHz vs 1216 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,270+2% | 11,077 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+50% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS+60% | 4.981 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz+7% | 1216 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+50% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 980 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 980 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 980) — the Radeon Pro Vega 48 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | NVENC 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 980's 220W — a 152% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 980). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-86% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 375.7+645% | 50.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 launched at $450 MSRP and currently averages $450, while the GeForce GTX 980 launched at $549 and now averages $50. The GeForce GTX 980 costs 88.9% less ($400 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 221.5 (GeForce GTX 980) — the GeForce GTX 980 offers 786% better value. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450-18% | $549 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $450 | $50-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.0 | 221.5+786% |
| Codename | Vega 10 | GM204 |
| Release | March 19 2019 | September 19 2014 |
| Ranking | #241 | #245 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















