Radeon Pro Vega 48
RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs RTX A2000 Embedded GPU Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs RTX A2000 Embedded GPU FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs RTX A2000 Embedded GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro Vega 48
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 35W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 25.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ❌16.7% higher power demand at 35W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs RTX A2000 Embedded GPU Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon Pro Vega 48
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,270 points.
RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 607 MHz to 1177 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,117 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 scores 11,270 and the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU reaches 11,117 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is built on GCN 5.0 while the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 2,560 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 6.026 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1300 MHz vs 1177 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,270+1% | 11,117 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+20% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS+33% | 6.026 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz+10% | 1177 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 192+140% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2.5 MB+233% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU carries 8 GB. RTX A2000 Embedded GPU gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 48 and 128-bit on the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 2 MB (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) — the Radeon Pro Vega 48 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 draws 30W versus the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU's 35W — a 15.4% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 500W (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 82mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-14% | 35W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 82mm |
| Height | 0mm | 4mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 375.7+18% | 317.6 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX A2000 Embedded GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450 | — |
| Codename | Vega 10 | GA107S |
| Release | March 19 2019 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #241 | #243 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro Vega 48 and RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
