
Radeon Instinct MI60

Radeon Pro Vega 48
Radeon Instinct MI60 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Instinct MI60 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Instinct MI60 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Instinct MI60
2018Why buy it
- ✅39.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon Pro Vega 48 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Instinct MI60 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌1233.3% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ❌900% higher power demand at 300W vs 30W.
Radeon Pro Vega 48
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,550 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1191.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.0 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 300W, a 270W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Instinct MI60 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Instinct MI60 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Instinct MI60
The Radeon Instinct MI60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2018. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,638 points.

Radeon Pro Vega 48
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,270 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Instinct MI60 scores 11,638 and the Radeon Pro Vega 48 reaches 11,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Instinct MI60 is built on GCN 5.1 while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 uses GCN 5.0, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 3,072 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Raw compute: 14.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Boost clocks: 1800 MHz vs 1300 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,638+3% | 11,270 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+33% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.75 TFLOPS+85% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1800 MHz+38% | 1300 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+33% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Instinct MI60 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 carries 0 MB. Radeon Instinct MI60 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Instinct MI60 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 48.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Decoder: UVD 7.2 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 48).
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.1 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.2 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Instinct MI60 draws 300W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 48's 30W — a 163.6% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 30W-90% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 38.8 | 375.7+868% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Instinct MI60 came in at $6000, while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 launched at $450. On MSRP, Radeon Pro Vega 48 was 92.5% cheaper ($5550 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 25.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) — the Radeon Pro Vega 48 offers 1215.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro Vega 48 (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6000 | $450-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.9 | 25.0+1216% |
| Codename | Vega 20 | Vega 10 |
| Release | November 18 2018 | March 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #232 | #241 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















