
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon Instinct MI60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2362.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 300W, a 170W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Instinct MI60 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon Instinct MI60
2018Why buy it
- ✅15.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌2309.6% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 130W.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon Instinct MI60
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2362.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 300W, a 170W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅15.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Instinct MI60 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌2309.6% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Radeon Instinct MI60?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Instinct MI60 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 131 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon Instinct MI60

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon Instinct MI60
Radeon Instinct MI60
The Radeon Instinct MI60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2018. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,638 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 and the Radeon Instinct MI60 reaches 11,638 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon Instinct MI60 uses GCN 5.1, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 14.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Instinct MI60). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1800 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+2% | 11,638 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4096+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 14.75 TFLOPS+64% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 1800 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 256+220% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+150% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Instinct MI60 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4 MB (Radeon Instinct MI60) — the Radeon Instinct MI60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Instinct MI60).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCE 4.1 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 7.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon Instinct MI60's 300W — a 79.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Radeon Instinct MI60). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-57% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 267mm |
| Height | 124mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+136% | 38.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon Instinct MI60 launched at $6000. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 95.9% less ($5751 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1.9 (Radeon Instinct MI60) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 2415.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-96% | $6000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+2416% | 1.9 |
| Codename | GA106 | Vega 20 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | November 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #224 | #232 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













