G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Instinct MI60 vs Radeon RX 7400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Instinct MI60 vs Radeon RX 7400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Instinct MI60

2018

Why buy it

✅3.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
2915.1% HIGHER MSRP
$6,000 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 58.6 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌597.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 43W.

Radeon RX 7400

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,801 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2919.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 43W instead of 300W, a 257W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Instinct MI60 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Instinct MI60 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon RX 7400 instead at 11,654 vs 11,638, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 7400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: native frame generation with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Radeon Instinct MI60 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 6nm process instead of 7nm, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2018. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 7400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,801 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $6,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2919.2% (58.6 vs 1.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon Instinct MI60 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon Instinct MI60 vs Radeon RX 7400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Instinct MI60

The Radeon Instinct MI60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2018. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,638 points.

Radeon RX 7400

The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Instinct MI60 scores 11,638 and the Radeon RX 7400 reaches 11,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Instinct MI60 is built on GCN 5.1 while the Radeon RX 7400 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400). Raw compute: 14.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400). Boost clocks: 1800 MHz vs 2300 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Instinct MI60	Radeon RX 7400
G3D Mark Score	11,638	11,654
Architecture	GCN 5.1	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	7 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	4096+129%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	14.75 TFLOPS	16.49 TFLOPS+12%
Boost Clock	1800 MHz	2300 MHz+28%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	256+129%	112
L1 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR 3 + AFMF

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Instinct MI60 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Radeon Instinct MI60	Radeon RX 7400
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Instinct MI60 and 64-bit on the Radeon RX 7400. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7400) — the Radeon Instinct MI60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Instinct MI60	Radeon RX 7400
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Instinct MI60	Radeon RX 7400
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	1	4+300%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400). Decoder: UVD 7.2 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400).

Feature	Radeon Instinct MI60	Radeon RX 7400
Encoder	VCE 4.1	VCN 4.0
Decoder	UVD 7.2	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Instinct MI60 draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 7400's 43W — a 149.9% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 450W (Radeon RX 7400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon Instinct MI60	Radeon RX 7400
TDP	300W	43W-86%
Recommended PSU	500W	450W-10%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	267mm	241mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	38.8	271.0+598%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Instinct MI60 came in at $6000, while the Radeon RX 7400 launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon RX 7400 was 96.7% cheaper ($5801 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 58.6 (Radeon RX 7400) — the Radeon RX 7400 offers 2984.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 7400 (2025 vs 2018).

Feature	Radeon Instinct MI60	Radeon RX 7400
MSRP	$6000	$199-97%
Performance per Dollar	1.9	58.6+2984%
Codename	Vega 20	Navi 33
Release	November 18 2018	August 8 2025
Ranking	#232	#229

Search Radeon Instinct MI60 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 7400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.