Quadro P4000
Radeon Instinct MI60
Quadro P4000 vs Radeon Instinct MI60 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P4000 vs Radeon Instinct MI60 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro P4000 vs Radeon Instinct MI60: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P4000
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,185 less on MSRP ($815 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 623.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.0 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($815 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 300W, a 195W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Instinct MI60 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Radeon Instinct MI60
2018Why buy it
- ✅25.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Quadro P4000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon Instinct MI60 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌636.2% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$815 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 105W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P4000 vs Radeon Instinct MI60 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro P4000
The Quadro P4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1202 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 105W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,431 points. Launch price was $815.
Radeon Instinct MI60
The Radeon Instinct MI60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2018. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,638 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P4000 scores 11,431 and the Radeon Instinct MI60 reaches 11,638 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Instinct MI60 uses GCN 5.1, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P4000) vs 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Raw compute: 5.304 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000) vs 14.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Instinct MI60). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 1800 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,431 | 11,638+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 4096+129% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.304 TFLOPS | 14.75 TFLOPS+178% |
| Boost Clock | 1480 MHz | 1800 MHz+22% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 256+129% |
| L1 Cache | 0.66 MB | 1 MB+52% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P4000 and 128-bit on the Radeon Instinct MI60. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P4000) vs 4 MB (Radeon Instinct MI60) — the Radeon Instinct MI60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P4000) vs 12.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P4000) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P4000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Instinct MI60).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCE 4.1 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | UVD 7.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P4000 draws 105W versus the Radeon Instinct MI60's 300W — a 96.3% difference. The Quadro P4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P4000) vs 500W (Radeon Instinct MI60). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 105W-65% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.9+181% | 38.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro P4000 came in at $815, while the Radeon Instinct MI60 launched at $6000. On MSRP, Quadro P4000 was 86.4% cheaper ($5185 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.0 (Quadro P4000) vs 1.9 (Radeon Instinct MI60) — the Quadro P4000 offers 636.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Instinct MI60 (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $815-86% | $6000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.0+637% | 1.9 |
| Codename | GP104 | Vega 20 |
| Release | February 6 2017 | November 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #239 | #232 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P4000 and Radeon Instinct MI60
