G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1660 vs Quadro P4000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1660 vs Quadro P4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1660

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $596 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
✅Delivers 278.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
✅Quadro P4000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1660 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quadro P4000

2017

Why buy it

✅2.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
272.1% HIGHER MSRP
$815 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 53.1 G3D/$ ($815 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro P4000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1660 instead at 11,639 vs 11,431, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1660 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 16nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1660 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $596 cheaper on MSRP at $219 vs $815, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 278.9% (53.1 vs 14.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro P4000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 1660 vs Quadro P4000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1660

The GeForce GTX 1660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 14 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,639 points. Launch price was $219.

Quadro P4000

The Quadro P4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1202 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 105W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,431 points. Launch price was $815.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1660 scores 11,639 and the Quadro P4000 reaches 11,431 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 is built on Turing while the Quadro P4000 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 1,792 (Quadro P4000). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 5.304 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1480 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660	Quadro P4000
G3D Mark Score	11,639+2%	11,431
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Process Node	12 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	1408	1792+27%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.027 TFLOPS	5.304 TFLOPS+6%
Boost Clock	1785 MHz+21%	1480 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	88	112+27%
L1 Cache	1.4 MB+112%	0.66 MB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	2 MB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1660 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P4000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660	Quadro P4000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1660 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P4000 carries 8 GB. Quadro P4000 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1660 and 256-bit on the Quadro P4000. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 2 MB (Quadro P4000) — the Quadro P4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660	Quadro P4000
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	2 MB+33%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 12.0 (Quadro P4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660	Quadro P4000
DirectX	12.1	12.0
Vulkan	1.3+30%	1.0
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P4000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P4000).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660	Quadro P4000
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	6th Gen NVENC
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1660 draws 120W versus the Quadro P4000's 105W — a 13.3% difference. The Quadro P4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 500W (Quadro P4000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660	Quadro P4000
TDP	120W	105W-13%
Recommended PSU	450W-10%	500W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	241mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	97.0	108.9+12%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1660 came in at $219, while the Quadro P4000 launched at $815. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1660 was 73.1% cheaper ($596 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 53.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 14.0 (Quadro P4000) — the GeForce GTX 1660 offers 279.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1660 (2019 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660	Quadro P4000
MSRP	$219-73%	$815
Performance per Dollar	53.1+279%	14.0
Codename	TU116	GP104
Release	March 14 2019	February 6 2017
Ranking	#231	#239

Search GeForce GTX 1660 on Amazon

Search Quadro P4000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.