Quadro P4000 vs Quadro P5200

NVIDIA

Quadro P4000

2017Core: 1202 MHzBoost: 1480 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P5200

2018Core: 1556 MHzBoost: 1746 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro P4000 vs Quadro P5200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P4000 vs Quadro P5200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P4000 vs Quadro P5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P4000

2017

Why buy it

  • 3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 63% HIGHER MSRP
    $815 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($815 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Quadro P5200

2018

Why buy it

  • Costs $315 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
  • Delivers 66.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
  • Quadro P4000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro P5200 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro P4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro P4000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro P5200 instead at 11,650 vs 11,431, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P5200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2018 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P5200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $315 cheaper on MSRP at $500 vs $815, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 66.1% (23.3 vs 14.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro P4000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro P4000 vs Quadro P5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro P4000

The Quadro P4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1202 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 105W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,431 points. Launch price was $815.

NVIDIA

Quadro P5200

The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P4000 scores 11,431 and the Quadro P5200 reaches 11,650 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4000 is built on Pascal while the Quadro P5200 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P4000) vs 2,560 (Quadro P5200). Raw compute: 5.304 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000) vs 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 1746 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P4000Quadro P5200
G3D Mark Score
11,431
11,650+2%
Architecture
Pascal
Pascal
Process Node
16 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
1792
2560+43%
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.304 TFLOPS
8.94 TFLOPS+69%
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1746 MHz+18%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
112
160+43%
L1 Cache
672 KB
960 KB+43%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P4000Quadro P5200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P4000 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5200 carries 4 GB. Quadro P4000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P4000 and 256-bit on the Quadro P5200.

FeatureQuadro P4000Quadro P5200
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P4000) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5200). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro P4000Quadro P5200
DirectX
12.0
12.1
Vulkan
1.0
1.1+10%
OpenGL
4.5
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P4000) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P4000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200).

FeatureQuadro P4000Quadro P5200
Encoder
6th Gen NVENC
NVENC 5.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP8
PureVideo HD VP7
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P4000 draws 105W versus the Quadro P5200's 100W — a 4.9% difference. The Quadro P5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P4000) vs 500W (Quadro P5200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureQuadro P4000Quadro P5200
TDP
105W
100W-5%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
108.9
116.5+7%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P4000 came in at $815, while the Quadro P5200 launched at $500. On MSRP, Quadro P5200 was 38.7% cheaper ($315 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.0 (Quadro P4000) vs 23.3 (Quadro P5200) — the Quadro P5200 offers 66.4% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P5200 (2018 vs 2017).

FeatureQuadro P4000Quadro P5200
MSRP
$815
$500-39%
Performance per Dollar
14.0
23.3+66%
Codename
GP104
GP104
Release
February 6 2017
February 21 2018
Ranking
#239
#230

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.