Quadro P4000
Radeon Pro Vega 48
Quadro P4000 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P4000 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro P4000 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P4000
2017Why buy it
- ✅11.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon Pro Vega 48 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro P4000 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌81.1% HIGHER MSRP$815 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($815 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ❌250% higher power demand at 105W vs 30W.
Radeon Pro Vega 48
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $365 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 78.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.0 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 105W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P4000 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro P4000
The Quadro P4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1202 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 105W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,431 points. Launch price was $815.
Radeon Pro Vega 48
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,270 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P4000 scores 11,431 and the Radeon Pro Vega 48 reaches 11,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 uses GCN 5.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P4000) vs 3,072 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Raw compute: 5.304 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 1300 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,431+1% | 11,270 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 3072+71% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.304 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS+51% |
| Boost Clock | 1480 MHz+14% | 1300 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 192+71% |
| L1 Cache | 672 KB | 768 KB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P4000 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 carries 0 MB. Quadro P4000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P4000 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 48. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P4000) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 48) — the Radeon Pro Vega 48 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P4000) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P4000) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P4000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 48).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P4000 draws 105W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 48's 30W — a 111.1% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P4000) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 105W | 30W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.9 | 375.7+245% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro P4000 came in at $815, while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 launched at $450. On MSRP, Radeon Pro Vega 48 was 44.8% cheaper ($365 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.0 (Quadro P4000) vs 25.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) — the Radeon Pro Vega 48 offers 78.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro Vega 48 (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $815 | $450-45% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.0 | 25.0+79% |
| Codename | GP104 | Vega 10 |
| Release | February 6 2017 | March 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #239 | #241 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P4000 and Radeon Pro Vega 48
