
Quadro P4000 vs Radeon RX 5600

Quadro P4000
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P4000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 5600 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 5600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 5600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P4000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro P4000 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 5600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $290 for the Quadro P4000, it costs 48% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 98.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P4000 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+98.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($290) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P4000 and Radeon RX 5600

Quadro P4000
The Quadro P4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1202 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 105W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,431 points. Launch price was $815.

Radeon RX 5600
The Radeon RX 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1265 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,753 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P4000 scores 11,431 and the Radeon RX 5600 reaches 11,753 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 5600 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P4000) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600). Raw compute: 5.304 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000) vs 5.829 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 1265 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,431 | 11,753+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2304+29% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.304 TFLOPS | 5.829 TFLOPS+10% |
| Boost Clock | 1480 MHz+17% | 1265 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 144+29% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P4000 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5600 has 6 GB. The Quadro P4000 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P4000) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600) — the Radeon RX 5600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P4000) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.2+20% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P4000) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P4000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P4000 draws 105W versus the Radeon RX 5600's 150W — a 35.3% difference. The Quadro P4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P4000) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 105W-30% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.9+39% | 78.4 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P4000 launched at $815 MSRP and currently averages $290, while the Radeon RX 5600 launched at $229 and now averages $150. The Radeon RX 5600 costs 48.3% less ($140 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 39.4 (Quadro P4000) vs 78.4 (Radeon RX 5600) — the Radeon RX 5600 offers 99% better value. The Radeon RX 5600 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $815 | $229-72% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $290 | $150-48% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.4 | 78.4+99% |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 10 |
| Release | February 6 2017 | July 7 2020 |
| Ranking | #239 | #295 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















