Quadro P4000 vs Radeon Pro 5700
Quadro P4000
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro 5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P4000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro 5700 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro 5700 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 5700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P4000.
| Insight | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 5700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $250 versus $290 for the Quadro P4000, it costs 14% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 16.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+16.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($290) | ✅More affordable ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P4000 and Radeon Pro 5700
Quadro P4000
The Quadro P4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1202 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 105W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,431 points. Launch price was $815.
Radeon Pro 5700
The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P4000 scores 11,431 and the Radeon Pro 5700 reaches 11,469 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P4000) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700). Raw compute: 5.304 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000) vs 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 1350 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,431 | 11,469 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2304+29% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.304 TFLOPS | 6.221 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 1480 MHz+10% | 1350 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 144+29% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P4000) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700) — the Radeon Pro 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P4000) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.4+40% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P4000) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P4000) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P4000 draws 105W versus the Radeon Pro 5700's 130W — a 21.3% difference. The Quadro P4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P4000) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 105W-19% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.9+23% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P4000 launched at $815 MSRP and currently averages $290, while the Radeon Pro 5700 launched at $799 and now averages $250. The Radeon Pro 5700 costs 13.8% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 39.4 (Quadro P4000) vs 45.9 (Radeon Pro 5700) — the Radeon Pro 5700 offers 16.5% better value. The Radeon Pro 5700 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $815 | $799-2% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $290 | $250-14% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.4 | 45.9+16% |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 10 |
| Release | February 6 2017 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #239 | #238 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P4000 and Radeon Pro 5700
