Quadro P4000 vs Radeon Pro 5700

CPU

GPU

Quadro P4000

2017Core: 1202 MHzBoost: 1480 MHz

Buy on Amazon

Radeon Pro 5700

2020Core: 1243 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz

Buy on Amazon

Quadro P4000 vs Radeon Pro 5700 Performance Spectrum

Quadro P4000

8 GB 105

11,431

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

Radeon Pro 5700

8 GB 130

11,469

+0.3%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P4000 vs Radeon Pro 5700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P4000 vs Radeon Pro 5700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P4000

2017

Why buy it

✅5.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 105W instead of 130W, a 25W reduction.
✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
2% HIGHER MSRP
$815 MSRPvs$799 MSRP

Radeon Pro 5700

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $16 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌23.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 105W.
❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro P4000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro 5700 instead at 11,469 vs 11,431, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro 5700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 16nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro 5700 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $16 cheaper on MSRP at $799 vs $815, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2.3% (14.4 vs 14.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro P4000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro P4000 vs Radeon Pro 5700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P4000

The Quadro P4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1202 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 105W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,431 points. Launch price was $815.

Radeon Pro 5700

The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P4000 scores 11,431 and the Radeon Pro 5700 reaches 11,469 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P4000) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700). Raw compute: 5.304 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000) vs 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 1350 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P4000	Radeon Pro 5700
G3D Mark Score	11,431	11,469
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	16 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	1792	2304+29%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.304 TFLOPS	6.221 TFLOPS+17%
Boost Clock	1480 MHz+10%	1350 MHz
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	112	144+29%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P4000	Radeon Pro 5700
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P4000 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5700. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P4000) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700) — the Radeon Pro 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P4000	Radeon Pro 5700
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P4000) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	Quadro P4000	Radeon Pro 5700
DirectX	12.0	12.1
Vulkan	1.0	1.4+40%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P4000) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P4000) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700).

Feature	Quadro P4000	Radeon Pro 5700
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC	VCN 2.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP8	VCN 2.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P4000 draws 105W versus the Radeon Pro 5700's 130W — a 21.3% difference. The Quadro P4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P4000) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Quadro P4000	Radeon Pro 5700
TDP	105W-19%	130W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	108.9+23%	88.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P4000 came in at $815, while the Radeon Pro 5700 launched at $799. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 5700 was 2% cheaper ($16 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.0 (Quadro P4000) vs 14.4 (Radeon Pro 5700) — the Radeon Pro 5700 offers 2.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 5700 (2020 vs 2017).

Feature	Quadro P4000	Radeon Pro 5700
MSRP	$815	$799-2%
Performance per Dollar	14.0	14.4+3%
Codename	GP104	Navi 10
Release	February 6 2017	August 4 2020
Ranking	#239	#238

Search Quadro P4000 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 5700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.