Radeon Instinct MI60
RTX A4000H
Radeon Instinct MI60 vs RTX A4000H Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Instinct MI60 vs RTX A4000H FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Instinct MI60 vs RTX A4000H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Instinct MI60
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌500% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$1,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 140W.
RTX A4000H
2021Why buy it
- ✅14.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $5,000 less on MSRP ($1,000 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 509.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 300W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Instinct MI60 vs RTX A4000H Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon Instinct MI60
The Radeon Instinct MI60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2018. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,638 points.
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Instinct MI60 scores 11,638 and the RTX A4000H reaches 11,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Instinct MI60 is built on GCN 5.1 while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 14.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 1800 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,638 | 11,815+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 | 6144+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.75 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+30% |
| Boost Clock | 1800 MHz+15% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 256+33% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A4000H gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Instinct MI60 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Instinct MI60 and 192-bit on the RTX A4000H.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: UVD 7.2 vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs None (RTX A4000H).
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.1 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 7.2 | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | None |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Instinct MI60 draws 300W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 72.7% difference. The RTX A4000H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 140W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 38.8 | 84.4+118% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Instinct MI60 came in at $6000, while the RTX A4000H launched at $1000. On MSRP, RTX A4000H was 83.3% cheaper ($5000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 11.8 (RTX A4000H) — the RTX A4000H offers 521.1% better value. The newer card here is RTX A4000H (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6000 | $1000-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.9 | 11.8+521% |
| Codename | Vega 20 | GA104 |
| Release | November 18 2018 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #232 | #226 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Instinct MI60 and RTX A4000H
