Radeon Pro Vega 48
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro Vega 48
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 35W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024Why buy it
- ✅17.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 25.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ❌16.7% higher power demand at 35W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon Pro Vega 48
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,270 points.
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 26 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,162 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 scores 11,270 and the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 11,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is built on GCN 5.0 while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 2,048 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 8.294 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 1300 MHz vs 2025 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,270 | 11,162 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+50% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS | 8.294 TFLOPS+4% |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 2025 MHz+56% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 192+200% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile carries 8 GB. RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 48 and 64-bit on the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 12 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 12 (12_2) (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 draws 30W versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile's 35W — a 15.4% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-14% | 35W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 375.7+18% | 318.9 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450 | — |
| Codename | Vega 10 | AD107 |
| Release | March 19 2019 | February 26 2024 |
| Ranking | #241 | #254 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro Vega 48 and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
