Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs Radeon Instinct MI60
Radeon Pro Vega 48
Popular choices:
Radeon Instinct MI60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega 48
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Instinct MI60
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Instinct MI60 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro Vega 48.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%) |
| Longevity | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | Standard Buffer (0 MB) | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $450 versus $600 for the Radeon Instinct MI60, it costs 25% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 29.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+29.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($450) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 48 and Radeon Instinct MI60
Radeon Pro Vega 48
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,270 points.
Radeon Instinct MI60
The Radeon Instinct MI60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2018. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,638 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 scores 11,270 and the Radeon Instinct MI60 reaches 11,638 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon Instinct MI60 uses GCN 5.1, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 14.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Instinct MI60). Boost clocks: 1300 MHz vs 1800 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,270 | 11,638+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 4096+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS | 14.75 TFLOPS+85% |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 1800 MHz+38% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 192 | 256+33% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Instinct MI60 has 8 GB. The Radeon Instinct MI60 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 12.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Instinct MI60).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | VCE 4.1 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | UVD 7.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 draws 30W versus the Radeon Instinct MI60's 300W — a 163.6% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 500W (Radeon Instinct MI60). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-90% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 375.7+868% | 38.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 launched at $450 MSRP and currently averages $450, while the Radeon Instinct MI60 launched at $6000 and now averages $600. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 costs 25% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 19.4 (Radeon Instinct MI60) — the Radeon Pro Vega 48 offers 28.9% better value. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450-93% | $6000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $450-25% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.0+29% | 19.4 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Vega 20 |
| Release | March 19 2019 | November 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #241 | #232 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro Vega 48 and Radeon Instinct MI60
