
Radeon Pro
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M470
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M470
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M470 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M470 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro | Radeon R9 M470 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 M470 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $80 versus $99 for the Radeon Pro, it costs 19% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 21.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro | Radeon R9 M470 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+21.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($99) | ✅More affordable ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro and Radeon R9 M470

Radeon Pro
The Radeon Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,366 points. Launch price was $1,899.

Radeon R9 M470
The Radeon R9 M470 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,331 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro scores 2,366 and the Radeon R9 M470 reaches 2,331 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro is built on GCN 5.1 while the Radeon R9 M470 uses GCN 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon Pro) vs 768 (Radeon R9 M470). Raw compute: 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M470). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro | Radeon R9 M470 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,366+2% | 2,331 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+400% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.06 TFLOPS+750% | 1.536 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1700 MHz+70% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 240+400% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+400% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro | Radeon R9 M470 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M470 has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M470 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M470) — the Radeon Pro has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro | Radeon R9 M470 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro draws 250W versus the Radeon R9 M470's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M470 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M470). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon Pro | Radeon R9 M470 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 75W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 9.5 | 31.1+227% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $99, while the Radeon R9 M470 launched at $350 and now averages $80. The Radeon R9 M470 costs 19.2% less ($19 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.9 (Radeon Pro) vs 29.1 (Radeon R9 M470) — the Radeon R9 M470 offers 21.8% better value. The Radeon Pro is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro | Radeon R9 M470 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $350 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $99 | $80-19% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.9 | 29.1+22% |
| Codename | Vega 20 | Emerald |
| Release | May 13 2020 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #194 | #649 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















