GRID M10-1Q vs Radeon Pro
GRID M10-1Q
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M10-1Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M10-1Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro.
| Insight | GRID M10-1Q | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $99 versus $500 for the GRID M10-1Q, it costs 80% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 401% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M10-1Q | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+401%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($99) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-1Q and Radeon Pro
GRID M10-1Q
The GRID M10-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,385 points.
Radeon Pro
The Radeon Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,366 points. Launch price was $1,899.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-1Q scores 2,385 and the Radeon Pro reaches 2,366 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro uses GCN 5.1, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-1Q) vs 3,840 (Radeon Pro). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1Q) vs 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1700 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M10-1Q | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,385 | 2,366 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3840+88% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 13.06 TFLOPS+171% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1700 MHz+44% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 240+88% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 960 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-1Q | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-1Q) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro) — the Radeon Pro has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M10-1Q | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M10-1Q) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID M10-1Q | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-1Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID M10-1Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-1Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GRID M10-1Q | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-10% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Perf/Watt | 10.6+12% | 9.5 |
Value Analysis
The GRID M10-1Q launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon Pro launched at $0 and now averages $99. The Radeon Pro costs 80.2% less ($401 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.8 (GRID M10-1Q) vs 23.9 (Radeon Pro) — the Radeon Pro offers 397.9% better value. The Radeon Pro is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M10-1Q | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $99-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.8 | 23.9+398% |
| Codename | GM204 | Vega 20 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | May 13 2020 |
| Ranking | #525 | #194 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID M10-1Q and Radeon Pro
