GRID M10-1Q
Radeon Pro
GRID M10-1Q vs Radeon Pro Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID M10-1Q vs Radeon Pro FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GRID M10-1Q vs Radeon Pro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID M10-1Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Radeon Pro
2020Why buy it
- ✅GRID M10-1Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M10-1Q vs Radeon Pro Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GRID M10-1Q
The GRID M10-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,385 points.
Radeon Pro
The Radeon Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,366 points. Launch price was $1,899.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-1Q scores 2,385 and the Radeon Pro reaches 2,366 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro uses GCN 5.1, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-1Q) vs 3,840 (Radeon Pro). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1Q) vs 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1700 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M10-1Q | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,385 | 2,366 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3840+88% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 13.06 TFLOPS+171% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1700 MHz+44% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 240+88% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 960 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-1Q | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-1Q and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-1Q) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro) — the Radeon Pro has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M10-1Q | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M10-1Q) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID M10-1Q | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-1Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID M10-1Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-1Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GRID M10-1Q | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-10% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Perf/Watt | 10.6+12% | 9.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID M10-1Q came in at $0, while the Radeon Pro launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GRID M10-1Q) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro) — the Radeon Pro offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M10-1Q | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | GM204 | Vega 20 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | May 13 2020 |
| Ranking | #525 | #194 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID M10-1Q and Radeon Pro
