
GRID M10-1Q vs Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H

GRID M10-1Q
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M10-1Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M10-1Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H.
| Insight | GRID M10-1Q | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $350 versus $500 for the GRID M10-1Q, it costs 30% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 42.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M10-1Q | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+42.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($350) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-1Q and Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H

GRID M10-1Q
The GRID M10-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,385 points.

Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H
The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,379 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-1Q scores 2,385 and the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H reaches 2,379 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-1Q) vs 1,408 (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1Q) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1845 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M10-1Q | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,385 | 2,379 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+45% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 5.196 TFLOPS+8% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1845 MHz+57% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-1Q | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | GRID M10-1Q | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-1Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H's 110W — a 68.7% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-1Q) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | GRID M10-1Q | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 110W-51% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 10.6 | 21.6+104% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M10-1Q launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H launched at $350 and now averages $350. The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H costs 30% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.8 (GRID M10-1Q) vs 6.8 (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H) — the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H offers 41.7% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M10-1Q | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $350 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $350-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.8 | 6.8+42% |
| Codename | GM204 | Navi 14 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #525 | #297 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.


















