FirePro M6100
GRID M10-1Q
FirePro M6100 vs GRID M10-1Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M6100 vs GRID M10-1Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro M6100 vs GRID M10-1Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M6100
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GRID M10-1Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M6100 vs GRID M10-1Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro M6100
The FirePro M6100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 27 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,495 points.
GRID M10-1Q
The GRID M10-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,385 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M6100 scores 2,495 and the GRID M10-1Q reaches 2,385 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M6100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GRID M10-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 896 (FirePro M6100) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-1Q). Raw compute: 1.971 TFLOPS (FirePro M6100) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1Q).
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,495+5% | 2,385 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2048+129% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.971 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+145% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 56 | 128+129% |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB | 768 KB+243% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M6100 and 64-bit on the GRID M10-1Q. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M6100) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-1Q) — the GRID M10-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M6100) vs 12_1 (GRID M10-1Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M6100 draws 150W versus the GRID M10-1Q's 225W — a 40% difference. The FirePro M6100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M6100) vs 350W (GRID M10-1Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-33% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 16.6+57% | 10.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M6100 came in at $0, while the GRID M10-1Q launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro M6100) vs Infinity (GRID M10-1Q) — the GRID M10-1Q offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-1Q (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | Emerald | GM204 |
| Release | May 27 2014 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #638 | #525 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro M6100 and GRID M10-1Q
