Radeon Pro W5500M vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Radeon Pro W5500M
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro W5500M is positioned at rank #3 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W5500M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro W5500M is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The Radeon Pro W5500M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro W5500M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST.
| Insight | Radeon Pro W5500M | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro W5500M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5500M and GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Radeon Pro W5500M
The Radeon Pro W5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,470 points.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 134W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,415 points. Launch price was $169.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5500M scores 3,470 and the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST reaches 3,415 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5500M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST uses Kepler, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Raw compute: 4.083 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs 1.585 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Boost clocks: 1450 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500M | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,470+2% | 3,415 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+83% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.083 TFLOPS+158% | 1.585 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1450 MHz+40% | 1033 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 88+38% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+426% | 0.38 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500M | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro W5500M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro W5500M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) — the Radeon Pro W5500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500M | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+426% | 0.38 MB |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500M | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500M | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | PureVideo VP5 |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264,VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5500M draws 85W versus the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST's 134W — a 44.7% difference. The Radeon Pro W5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500M | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W-37% | 134W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 97°C |
| Perf/Watt | 40.8+60% | 25.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W5500M is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500M | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $169 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $50 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GK106 |
| Release | February 10 2020 | March 26 2013 |
| Ranking | #544 | #551 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro W5500M and GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
