
Radeon Pro W5500M vs GRID M6-8Q

Radeon Pro W5500M
Popular choices:

GRID M6-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro W5500M is positioned at rank 3 and the GRID M6-8Q is on rank 273, so the Radeon Pro W5500M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W5500M
Performance Per Dollar GRID M6-8Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro W5500M uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro W5500M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M6-8Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M6-8Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro W5500M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro W5500M | GRID M6-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID M6-8Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5500M and GRID M6-8Q

Radeon Pro W5500M
The Radeon Pro W5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,470 points.

GRID M6-8Q
The GRID M6-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,568 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5500M scores 3,470 and the GRID M6-8Q reaches 3,568 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5500M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GRID M6-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs 1,536 (GRID M6-8Q). Raw compute: 4.083 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID M6-8Q).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500M | GRID M6-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,470 | 3,568+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 1536+9% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.083 TFLOPS+84% | 2.218 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 88 | 96+9% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500M | GRID M6-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro W5500M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M6-8Q has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro W5500M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500M | GRID M6-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500M | GRID M6-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5500M draws 85W versus the GRID M6-8Q's 100W — a 16.2% difference. The Radeon Pro W5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs 350W (GRID M6-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500M | GRID M6-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W-15% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 40.8+14% | 35.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W5500M is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500M | GRID M6-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $1500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $100 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GM204 |
| Release | February 10 2020 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #544 | #535 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















