Radeon Pro W5500M vs Tesla C2050 / C2070

AMD

Radeon Pro W5500M

2020Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla C2050 / C2070

2011Core: 574 MHz
Similar parts
····

Radeon Pro W5500M vs Tesla C2050 / C2070 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro W5500M vs Tesla C2050 / C2070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro W5500M

2020

Why buy it

  • Tesla C2050 / C2070 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro W5500M is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 85W instead of 238W, a 153W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).

Tesla C2050 / C2070

2011

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 180% higher power demand at 238W vs 85W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro W5500M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (3,470 vs 3,428), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro W5500M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Tesla C2050 / C2070 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Tesla C2050 / C2070 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro W5500M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro W5500M vs Tesla C2050 / C2070 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro W5500M

The Radeon Pro W5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,470 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla C2050 / C2070

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,428 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro W5500M scores 3,470 and the Tesla C2050 / C2070 reaches 3,428 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5500M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 uses Fermi, both on 7 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs 448 (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Raw compute: 4.083 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050 / C2070).

FeatureRadeon Pro W5500MTesla C2050 / C2070
G3D Mark Score
3,470+1%
3,428
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
Fermi
Process Node
7 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1408+214%
448
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.083 TFLOPS+297%
1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
48+50%
TMUs
88+57%
56
L2 Cache
2 MB+167%
0.75 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro W5500MTesla C2050 / C2070
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro W5500M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 carries 6 GB. Tesla C2050 / C2070 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro W5500M and 64-bit on the Tesla C2050 / C2070. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2050 / C2070) — the Radeon Pro W5500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro W5500MTesla C2050 / C2070
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
6 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+167%
0.75 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 1.

FeatureRadeon Pro W5500MTesla C2050 / C2070
Max Displays
6+500%
1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro W5500M draws 85W versus the Tesla C2050 / C2070's 238W — a 94.7% difference. The Radeon Pro W5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs 350W (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon Pro W5500MTesla C2050 / C2070
TDP
85W-64%
238W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
248mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Perf/Watt
40.8+183%
14.4
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro W5500M (2020 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon Pro W5500MTesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP
$2499
Codename
Navi 14
GF100
Release
February 10 2020
July 25 2011
Ranking
#544
#569

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.