GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Radeon Pro W5500M
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs Radeon Pro W5500M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs Radeon Pro W5500M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs Radeon Pro W5500M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W5500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌57.6% higher power demand at 134W vs 85W.
Radeon Pro W5500M
2020Why buy it
- ✅59.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro W5500M is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 134W, a 49W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs Radeon Pro W5500M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 134W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,415 points. Launch price was $169.
Radeon Pro W5500M
The Radeon Pro W5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,470 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST scores 3,415 and the Radeon Pro W5500M reaches 3,470 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro W5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500M). Raw compute: 1.585 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 4.083 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500M). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1450 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,415 | 3,470+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1408+83% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.585 TFLOPS | 4.083 TFLOPS+158% |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz | 1450 MHz+40% |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 64 | 88+38% |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 2 MB+426% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro W5500M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5500M carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro W5500M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro W5500M. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro W5500M) — the Radeon Pro W5500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 2 MB+426% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500M). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5500M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP5 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST draws 134W versus the Radeon Pro W5500M's 85W — a 44.7% difference. The Radeon Pro W5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 350W (Radeon Pro W5500M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 134W | 85W-37% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 97°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 25.5 | 40.8+60% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon Pro W5500M (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | — |
| Codename | GK106 | Navi 14 |
| Release | March 26 2013 | February 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #551 | #544 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST and Radeon Pro W5500M
