
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

Radeon E8870PCIe
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs Radeon E8870PCIe Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs Radeon E8870PCIe FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs Radeon E8870PCIe: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
2013Why buy it
- β 53.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β Costs $81 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- β Delivers 50% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 13.5 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- β2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β262.2% higher power demand at 134W vs 37W.
Radeon E8870PCIe
2014Why buy it
- β Draws 37W instead of 134W, a 97W reduction.
- β More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012β2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β47.9% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.5 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs Radeon E8870PCIe Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 134W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,415 points. Launch price was $169.

Radeon E8870PCIe
The Radeon E8870PCIe is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 37W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,368 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST scores 3,415 and the Radeon E8870PCIe reaches 3,368 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is built on Kepler while the Radeon E8870PCIe uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 640 (Radeon E8870PCIe). Raw compute: 1.585 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon E8870PCIe). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 625 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,415+1% | 3,368 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+20% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.585 TFLOPS+98% | 0.8 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz+65% | 625 MHz |
| ROPs | 24+50% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+60% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 160 KB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon E8870PCIe leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST and 64-bit on the Radeon E8870PCIe. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 256 KB (Radeon E8870PCIe) β the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST draws 134W versus the Radeon E8870PCIe's 37W β a 113.5% difference. The Radeon E8870PCIe is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 350W (Radeon E8870PCIe). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 134W | 37W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | β |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 2 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 97Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 25.5 | 91.0+257% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST came in at $169, while the Radeon E8870PCIe launched at $250. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST was 32.4% cheaper ($81 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 13.5 (Radeon E8870PCIe) β the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST offers 49.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon E8870PCIe (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-32% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.2+50% | 13.5 |
| Codename | GK106 | Venus |
| Release | March 26 2013 | January 25 2014 |
| Ranking | #551 | #734 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















