GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌69% HIGHER MSRP$169 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.2 vs 33.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌346.7% higher power demand at 134W vs 30W.
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $69 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 67.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.9 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 134W, a 104W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 134W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,415 points. Launch price was $169.
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST scores 3,415 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,390 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is built on Kepler while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,415 | 3,390 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+700% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST and 64-bit on the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_0) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs QuickSync (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | QuickSync |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP5 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST draws 134W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 126.8% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 97°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 134W | 30W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 97°C | 85-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 25.5 | 113.0+343% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST came in at $169, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100. On MSRP, Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 was 40.8% cheaper ($69 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 33.9 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) — the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers 67.8% better value. The newer card here is Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $100-41% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.2 | 33.9+68% |
| Codename | GK106 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | March 26 2013 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #551 | #508 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
