
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

Radeon Pro 560
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs Radeon Pro 560 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs Radeon Pro 560 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs Radeon Pro 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $331 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 190.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 560 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌78.7% higher power demand at 134W vs 75W.
Radeon Pro 560
2017Why buy it
- ✅38.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 134W, a 59W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌195.9% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs Radeon Pro 560 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 134W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,415 points. Launch price was $169.

Radeon Pro 560
The Radeon Pro 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,475 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST scores 3,415 and the Radeon Pro 560 reaches 3,475 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560). Raw compute: 1.585 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon Pro 560 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,415 | 3,475+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1024+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.585 TFLOPS | 1.858 TFLOPS+17% |
| ROPs | 24+50% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 256 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 1 MB+163% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 560 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon Pro 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 560. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 560) — the Radeon Pro 560 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon Pro 560 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 1 MB+163% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST draws 134W versus the Radeon Pro 560's 75W — a 56.5% difference. The Radeon Pro 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 560). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon Pro 560 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 134W | 75W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 97°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 25.5 | 46.3+82% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST came in at $169, while the Radeon Pro 560 launched at $500. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST was 66.2% cheaper ($331 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 7.0 (Radeon Pro 560) — the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST offers 188.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 560 (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon Pro 560 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-66% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.2+189% | 7.0 |
| Codename | GK106 | Polaris 21 |
| Release | March 26 2013 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #551 | #543 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















