
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Popular choices:

Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $75), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 46.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+46.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST and Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 134W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,415 points. Launch price was $169.
Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
The Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in October 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST scores 3,415 and the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) reaches 3,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is built on Kepler while the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 384 (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 993 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,415 | 3,500+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+100% | 384 |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz+4% | 993 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 12 (11_0) (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | — |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP5 | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST draws 134W versus the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)'s 30W — a 126.8% difference. The Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 350W (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 97°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 134W | 30W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 97°C | 75-23% |
| Perf/Watt | 25.5 | 116.7+358% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST launched at $169 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) launched at $150 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST costs 33.3% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 68.3 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 46.7 (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)) — the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST offers 46.3% better value. The Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $150-11% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-33% | $75 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.3+46% | 46.7 |
| Codename | GK106 | Surface Book |
| Release | March 26 2013 | October 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #551 | #782 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















