Arc 8-Core iGPU
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Arc 8-Core iGPU vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc 8-Core iGPU vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Arc 8-Core iGPU vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc 8-Core iGPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Arc 8-Core iGPU is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 134W, a 89W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2023 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌197.6% HIGHER MSRP$503 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($503 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $334 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $503 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 190.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $503 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌197.8% higher power demand at 134W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc 8-Core iGPU vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc 8-Core iGPU
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 2300 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 134W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,415 points. Launch price was $169.
Graphics Performance
The Arc 8-Core iGPU scores 3,500 and the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST reaches 3,415 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is built on Xe LPG while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Boost clocks: 2300 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,500+2% | 3,415 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | Kepler |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 768+9500% |
| Boost Clock | 2300 MHz+123% | 1033 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB+2400% | 0.06 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc 8-Core iGPU leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc 8-Core iGPU has 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc 8-Core iGPU and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (FL 11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST).
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | PureVideo VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc 8-Core iGPU draws 45W versus the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST's 134W — a 99.4% difference. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 97°C.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-66% | 134W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C-12% | 97°C |
| Perf/Watt | 77.8+205% | 25.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc 8-Core iGPU came in at $503, while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST was 66.4% cheaper ($334 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.0 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 20.2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) — the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST offers 188.6% better value. The newer card here is Arc 8-Core iGPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $503 | $169-66% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.0 | 20.2+189% |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | GK106 |
| Release | December 14 2023 | March 26 2013 |
| Ranking | #362 | #551 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc 8-Core iGPU and GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
