Arc 8-Core iGPU vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Arc 8-Core iGPU
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is positioned at rank #417 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc 8-Core iGPU
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The Arc 8-Core iGPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Arc 8-Core iGPU | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) |
| Longevity | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $400 for the Arc 8-Core iGPU, it costs 88% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 680.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc 8-Core iGPU | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+680.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc 8-Core iGPU and GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Arc 8-Core iGPU
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 2300 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 134W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,415 points. Launch price was $169.
Graphics Performance
The Arc 8-Core iGPU scores 3,500 and the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST reaches 3,415 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is built on Xe LPG while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Boost clocks: 2300 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,500+2% | 3,415 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | Kepler |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 768+9500% |
| Boost Clock | 2300 MHz+123% | 1033 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB+2400% | 0.06 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc 8-Core iGPU comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (FL 11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST).
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | PureVideo VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc 8-Core iGPU draws 45W versus the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST's 134W — a 99.4% difference. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 97°C.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-66% | 134W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C-12% | 97°C |
| Perf/Watt | 77.8+205% | 25.5 |
Value Analysis
The Arc 8-Core iGPU launched at $503 MSRP and currently averages $400, while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST launched at $169 and now averages $50. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST costs 87.5% less ($350 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.8 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 68.3 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) — the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST offers 676.1% better value. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $503 | $169-66% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $400 | $50-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.8 | 68.3+676% |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | GK106 |
| Release | December 14 2023 | March 26 2013 |
| Ranking | #362 | #551 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc 8-Core iGPU and GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
