GRID K520 vs Radeon Pro W5500M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K520 vs Radeon Pro W5500M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K520 vs Radeon Pro W5500M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K520

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌164.7% higher power demand at 225W vs 85W.

Radeon Pro W5500M

2020

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅GRID K520 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro W5500M is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 85W instead of 225W, a 140W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID K520 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (3,516 vs 3,470), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro W5500M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID K520 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID K520 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro W5500M has the stronger long-term case.

GRID K520 vs Radeon Pro W5500M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K520

The GRID K520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,516 points. Launch price was $3,599.

Radeon Pro W5500M

The Radeon Pro W5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,470 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K520 scores 3,516 and the Radeon Pro W5500M reaches 3,470 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K520 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro W5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K520) vs 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500M). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K520) vs 4.083 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500M).

Feature	GRID K520	Radeon Pro W5500M
G3D Mark Score	3,516+1%	3,470
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	1536 ×2+9%	1408
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS ×2	4.083 TFLOPS+78%
ROPs	32 ×2	32
TMUs	128 ×2+45%	88
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K520	Radeon Pro W5500M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID K520 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5500M carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro W5500M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K520 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro W5500M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K520) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro W5500M) — the Radeon Pro W5500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID K520	Radeon Pro W5500M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.

Feature	GRID K520	Radeon Pro W5500M
Max Displays	0	6

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1 (GRID K520) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500M). Decoder: NVDEC 1 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GRID K520) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5500M).

Feature	GRID K520	Radeon Pro W5500M
Encoder	NVENC 1	VCN 2.0
Decoder	NVDEC 1	VCN 2.0
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	HEVC,H.264,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K520 draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro W5500M's 85W — a 90.3% difference. The Radeon Pro W5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K520) vs 350W (Radeon Pro W5500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID K520	Radeon Pro W5500M
TDP	225W	85W-62%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	15.6	40.8+162%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro W5500M (2020 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID K520	Radeon Pro W5500M
MSRP	$3599	—
Codename	GK104	Navi 14
Release	July 23 2013	February 10 2020
Ranking	#540	#544

Search GRID K520 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro W5500M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.