Quadro 7000 vs Radeon Pro W5500M

NVIDIA

Quadro 7000

2012Core: 651 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro W5500M

2020Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro 7000 vs Radeon Pro W5500M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 7000 vs Radeon Pro W5500M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 7000 vs Radeon Pro W5500M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 7000

2012

Why buy it

  • 23.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($14,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 140% higher power demand at 204W vs 85W.

Radeon Pro W5500M

2020

Why buy it

  • Quadro 7000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro W5500M is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 85W instead of 204W, a 119W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro 7000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $14,499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro 7000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 23.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1% in PassMark G3D (3,505 vs 3,470), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro W5500M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro 7000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro 7000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro W5500M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 7000 vs Radeon Pro W5500M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro 7000

The Quadro 7000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 2 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,505 points. Launch price was $14,499.

AMD

Radeon Pro W5500M

The Radeon Pro W5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,470 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 7000 scores 3,505 and the Radeon Pro W5500M reaches 3,470 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 7000 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon Pro W5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro 7000) vs 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500M). Raw compute: 1.3322 TFLOPS (Quadro 7000) vs 4.083 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500M).

FeatureQuadro 7000Radeon Pro W5500M
G3D Mark Score
3,505+1%
3,470
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
512
1408+175%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.3322 TFLOPS
4.083 TFLOPS+206%
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
64
88+38%
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
2 MB+167%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro 7000Radeon Pro W5500M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 7000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5500M carries 4 GB. Quadro 7000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 7000 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro W5500M. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Quadro 7000) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro W5500M) — the Radeon Pro W5500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro 7000Radeon Pro W5500M
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
2 MB+167%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 7000 draws 204W versus the Radeon Pro W5500M's 85W — a 82.4% difference. The Radeon Pro W5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 7000) vs 350W (Radeon Pro W5500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro 7000Radeon Pro W5500M
TDP
204W
85W-58%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
17.2
40.8+137%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro W5500M (2020 vs 2012).

FeatureQuadro 7000Radeon Pro W5500M
MSRP
$14499
Codename
GF110
Navi 14
Release
May 2 2012
February 10 2020
Ranking
#541
#544

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.